Pipelines for greenhouse gas emission reductions – the new Canadian social contract shaping energy policy, politics
A new public opinion poll shows that 84 per cent of Canadians think President Donald Trump made a mistake exiting the Paris Climate Accord, and the same percentage want Canada to remain committed to the international agreement to fight climate change. Part of the reason Canadians feel that way is they understand and support the gradual transition from fossil fuels to clean energy technologies.
Even Canadian Conservatives, usually staunch supporters of the reality star president, “are convinced that Trump’s decision was unwise (61%) and that Canada should stay in the deal (62%),” according to Abacus Data.
And that includes a majority of Conservative respondents – 53 per cent – in Alberta and Saskatchewan, usually the least likely to support climate mitigation policies.
“There are few Donald Trump fans in Canada and his decision to pull the United States out of the Paris Accord on climate change did very little to gain new ones,” says David Coletto, Abacus CEO.
“The overwhelming majority in Canada think it was a bad decision and a similar number think Canada to should press ahead and remain committed to the Accord.”
Trump is so reviled by Canadians that his decision to exit the Paris accord probably forced new Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer to reverse course and endorse the agreement, according to Anderson.
“Donald Trump, while intending to do the opposite, has possibly done more to galvanize support for climate action than his predecessors in the White House,” says Bruce Anderson, Abacus Data chairman.
But Canadian support for the Paris Accord has deeper roots than just distaste for the American one-man political circus.
Coletto and Anderson argue that “possibly the most important finding in this survey is the growing feeling among Canadians, including many Conservatives and Albertans, that an energy transition is not only good for the environment but probably sensible economic strategy too.”
As a journalist who has reported and written about the Energy Transition for the past five years, that conclusion feels right to me.
The tide is turning for Canadian attitudes about energy. I see it on my social media accounts every day, where the attacks from Energy Transition-denying conservatives are declining and more moderates and political centrists are embracing the idea that as new energy technologies mature and gain marketshare over the course of 50 to 75 years, the global economy will wean itself off fossil fuels.
The spread of this view in Alberta and Saskatchewan is good news, especially for the Alberta-based oil and gas industry.
Why? Because previous Abacus polling demonstrates that Canadians are overwhelmingly willing to support new energy infrastructure projects – like Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Expansion pipeline from Alberta to the West Coast – if governments offset more oil production with climate mitigation policies.
Pipelines (and other energy stuff) for greenhouse gas emission reductions – that is the new social contract that is shaping Canadian energy policy and politics.
Industry groups like the Canadian Assoc. of Petroleum Producers and the Canadian Energy Pipelines Assoc. can use the new energy politics to their advantage in markets like Vancouver, where the political culture is 180 degrees opposite that in Calgary.
The essence of the Energy Transition argument is that oil may not be forever, but while the new technologies are taking hold, which most economists agree will be a lengthy process, Alberta has the moral and legal right to sell its product on international markets and to get that product to tidewater.
Conversely, as long as Alberta is implementing GHG reduction policies like the oil sands emissions cap and fugitive methane emissions reductions, British Columbia has the moral and legal obligation to accede to – if not outright support – the Trans Mountain Expansion project, construction scheduled to begin this Sept.
Decarbonization of existing energy systems while developing clean energy technologies is the grand tradeoff of the Paris Climate Accord.
By rejecting the Accord, Trump is ironically helping solidify support for the Accord – and the Energy Transition and acceptance that oil and gas will be with us for decades yet – in other countries like Canada.
“Trump probably did more to mobilize action for action on climate change in opposing the Accord than any international leader could have done arguing in favour of it,” concludes Coletto.
Carry on, Donald Trump, you magnificent orange bull in a political china shop. Who could have guessed that your staggering incompetence as the so-called Leader of the Free World would stampede Canadians into supporting an international agreement that both builds support for climate mitigation and helps build political legitimacy for the Alberta oil and gas industry?
Conducted online with 1,518 Canadians aged 18 and over from June 2 to 5, 2017. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a large representative panel of over 500,000 Canadians. The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association policy limits statements about margins of sampling error for most online surveys. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of 1,518 is +/- 2.6%, 19 times out of 20. The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.
Some great points here Unfortunately with a population of over 30 million I have doubts that these number represent reality. I live in Alberta and am well networked in the western Canadian oilfield I can’t think of one guy who supports this in fact many of us support Trump
Why do we tolerate green energy? It’s because we are being forced to not because we believe in it
I would certainly like to see Just who was interviewed and from what sector before giving the opening statement any credibility Canada is huge and needs and values across the country are widely varied
So, instead of explaining the science behind the Climate Change people, we will now start using it in articles as if it is simple fact. Don’t worry that these environmental extremists have kept changing there cause from CO2 Danger to Greenhouse Gas will kill us all, to Global Warming to Climate Change. Don’t worry about all the scientific data that was shown to have been altered to support their arguments. Don’t worry about all the miss statements in Al Gore’s climate movie “inconvenient Lie” (that made him a multi-millionaire. allowed him to buy the Current TV then sell it to Al-Jaziera and make 1/2 Billion off it, all the while driving around in his caravan of Escalades, living on his giant non-green estate with a huge carbon footprint). Lets just accept it. Even still, let Canada take on the financial burden that the Climate Accord was going to put on the US while not sharing the expenses with most other major countries, and with the minimal impact it was going to have on the climate. The main purpose of the accord was to transfer money from the US to many other countries to aid them in their “fight” against Climate Change. Every piece of Environmental Legislation does almost nothing if anything at all about climate, it only transfers money from 1 person or country to another. Look at Al Gore, after making his movie, he and other investors started a Carbon Credit Exchange where companies that through legislation, if they had a carbon emission problem, could exchange or “Buy” credits from someone who had a surplus. That effectively has zero affect on carbon emissions, but money was transferred from 1 entity to another. Ho, don’t forget about the exchange making a fee or commission off the transaction….
The fact is, the climate on the Earth has been changing since its Creation, even before humans were placed here. If we went extinct tomorrow from an asteroid or what ever, the planet will still go through climate changes. If you look at the theoretical climate of the Earth as scientists have built the time line, we have gone through ice- ages, heat stages, and it appears to be cyclical. According to the same scientists who say we are in a crisis all the sudden, over the last 150 years, the earth has warmed less than 1 degree, and we are in a cooling trend (hence the change from Global Warming). All this stuff is just a socialist attempt to move money in a different way. As with everything, follow the money and you will see the real reason behind the movement or legislation, etc.
If you don’t know that Global warming and Climate change is the same thing, just different terms used, then I doubt you’ve read the science behind the theory.